This review paper focuses on the study of soil stabilization using lime and fly ash to improve the engineering properties of weak soils. Lime reacts with clay minerals to reduce plasticity and enhance strength, while fly ash provides additional pozzolanic reactions that improve durability. The combined use of lime and fly ash significantly increases bearing capacity, compaction characteristics, and California Bearing Ratio (CBR) values. Based on past research, this method is found to be cost-effective, environmentally friendly, and suitable for subgrade and foundation construction. The study highlights its potential for sustainable geotechnical engineering applications.
Introduction
Soil stabilization is crucial in civil engineering to improve the strength, durability, and workability of weak or problematic soils. Expansive or soft soils, if untreated, can cause settlement, cracking, and structural failures.
Chemical Stabilization:
Chemical stabilization using lime and fly ash is widely employed. Lime reacts with clay minerals via cation exchange and pozzolanic reactions, reducing plasticity, swelling, and enhancing strength. Fly ash, an industrial by-product, contains reactive silica and alumina that, with lime, form cementitious compounds, further improving soil properties.
May show limited effect on compaction in some cases.
Improves long-term stability via pozzolanic reactions.
Effects of Fly Ash:
Decreases plasticity and improves workability.
Alters compaction characteristics, increasing optimum moisture content and reducing maximum dry density.
Enhances soil strength, cohesion, and bearing capacity.
Alone, may be insufficient for highly plastic soils.
Combined Lime–Fly Ash Stabilization:
Offers both short-term (reduced shrinkage, better compaction) and long-term (increased strength and durability) improvements.
Enhances workability, strength, and durability more effectively than either additive alone.
Environmentally beneficial by recycling industrial waste and reducing cement use.
Gaps and Future Research:
Optimal proportions of lime and fly ash need further investigation.
Most studies focus on fine-grained soils; coarse-grained soil behavior under similar treatments requires more research.
References
[1] Castro-Fresno, D., Movilla-Quesada, D., Vega-Zamanillo, A., & Calzada-Pérez, M. A. (2011). Lime Stabilization of bentonite sludge from tunnel boring. Applied Clay Science, 51(3), 250-257.
[2] Degirmenci, N., Okuru, A., & Turabi, A. (2007). Application of phosphogypsum in soil stabilization. Building and environment, 42(9), 3393.
[3] Ferreira, S. T. G., Kuser, H. H, Garrido, R. G., Trindade-Filho, A.. Paula, K. A., Galvão, M. F., et al. (2011). Floods and mudslides in tae State of Rio de Janeiro and a plane crash in the Brazilian Amazon rainforest: A study of two different experiences in disaster victim identification (DVI). Forensic Science International: Genetics Supplement Series, 3(1), e516-e517.
[4] Fowze, J. S. M., Bergado, D. T., Soralump, S., Voottipreux, P., & Dechasakuisom, M. (2012). Rain-triggered landslide hazards an mitigation measures in Thailand: From research to practice. Geotextiles and geomembranes, 30(0), 50-64.
[5] Ghosh, A. (2009). Bearing ratio of reinforced fly ash overlying soft soil and deformation modulus of fly ash. Geotextiles and geomembranes, 27(4), 313.
[6] Glade, Glade, T., Anderson, M., & Crozier, M. J. (2005). Landslide Hazard and Risk.
[7] Harichane, K., Ghrici, M., Kenai, S., & Grine, K. (2011). Use of Natural Pozzolana and Lime for Stabilization of Cohesive Soils. Geotechnical and geological engineering, 29(5), 759.
[8] Harichane, K., Ghrici, M., & Missoum, H. (2011). Influence of natural pozzolana and lime additives on the temporal variation of soil compaction and shear strength. Frontiers of Earth Science, 5(2), 162-169.
[9] Harichane, K., Ghrici, M., & Missoum, H. (2011). Influence of natural pozzolana and lime additives on the temporal variation of soil compaction and shear strength. Frontiers of Earth Science, 5(2), 162-169.
[10] Kavak, A., & Akyarl?, A. (2007). A field application for lime stabilization. Environmental geology, 51(6), 987.
[11] Lina, D.-F., Linb, K.-L., Hunge, M.-J., & Luoa, H.-L. (2007). Sludge ash/hydrated lime on the geotechnical properties of soft soil. Journal of hazardous materials, 145(1-2), 58.
[12] McCarthy, M. J., Csetenyi, L. J., Sachdeva, A., & Dhir, R. K. (2012). Identifying the role of fly ash properties for minimizing sulfate-heave in lime-stabilized soils. Fuel, 92(1), 27-36.
[13] McCarthy, M. J, Csetenyi, L. J., Sachdeva, A., & Jones, R. (2009). Role of Fly Ash in the Mitigation of Swelling in Lime Stabilised Sulfate-Bearing Soils. Paper presented at the World of Coal Ash (WOCA)... Lexington, KY. USA
[14] Misra, A., Biswas, D., & Upadhyaya, S. (2005). Physico-mechanical behavior of self-cementing class C fly ash-clay mixtures. Fuel, 84(11), 1410.
[15] Parsons, R. L., & Kneebone, E. (2005). Field performance of fly ash stabilised subgrades. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers. Ground improvement, 9(1), 33-38.
[16] Prabakar, J., Dendorkar, N., & Morchhale, R. K. (2004). Influence of fly ash on strength behavior of typical soils. Construction & building materials, 18(4), 263.
[17] Seco, A., Ramírez, F., Miqueleiz, L., García, B., & Prieto, E. (2011). The use of non-conventional additives in Marls stabilization. Applied Clay Science, 51(4), 419-423.
[18] Senol, A. (2006). Soft subgrades\' stabilization by using various fly ashes. Resources, conservation, and recycling, 46(4), 365.87 Proc. INTERMAG Conf., pp. 2.2-1-2.2-6.
[19] Sezer, A. (2006). Utilization of a very high lime fly ash for improvement of Izmir clay. Building and environment, 41(2), 150.
[20] Tu, W., Zand, B., Butalia, T. S., Ajlouni, M. A., & Wolfe, W. E. (2009). Constant rate of strain consolidation of resedimented Class F fly ash. Fuel, 88(7), 1154.
[21] Yarba?, N., Kalkan, E., & Akbulut, S. (2007). Modification of the geotechnical properties, as influenced by freeze-thaw, of granular soils with waste additives. Cold regions science and technology, 48(1), 44.